What Happened To Football's Next Great Stat?

ESPN's QBR passer rating was supposed to be the rating that quantified the most complicated position in sports. Instead, it more or less disappeared.
Share |

It’s football season, and so men are shouting. The merits of their respective arguments are measured in proportion to the decibel level at which those arguments are offered. Business as usual at ESPN.

Specifically, five men are sitting around an oblong table, yowling hymns to powerful notions they are unable or unwilling to define: intangibles, willpower, heart, effort, desire. It could be any NFL pregame or halftime or postgame show, but this is ESPN's Monday Night Countdown, and it is helping viewers get ready for some football. Those five men shouting are not enough, and so there are three other men at the site of Monday's game; they sit around another oblong table, voices also raised. Of these eight men, six are former players or coaches, and the other two are ESPN Personalities Chris Berman and Stuart Scott. Across the bottom of the screen, one of the most complex, involved and fascinating statistics about football ever created—the result of years of work and multitudes of dollars that only a profit-machine like ESPN could afford to spend on a statistic—is scrolling across the screen. No one is shouting about Total QBR, though. No one is even really whispering about it.

Total QBR (or more accurately, QBR, since the 'total' is a marketing prefix) was fighting an uphill battle from the start. Jon Gruden, former-coach-turned-ESPN-shouter, welcomed it into the world by cautioning, “I’m worried about it because it sounds like a lot of stuff and it’s another quarterback statistical rating formula.” And this was Gruden, a quarterback-obsessive who, in our high-volume/low-wattage national football converation, qualifies as an intellectual. The rest of the football discourse—all limp n' loud machismo and soft-focus Tebow slashfic and sentimental pomp—is backwards and anti-thought enough to make Tony Siragusa look like Slavoj Zizek. This was the environment in which QBR was expected to grow.

Last year, after years of expensive and time-consuming research, ESPN unveiled QBR with great fanfare as a replacement for the conventional (and widely unloved) passer rating. It was supposed to change the way quarterbacks were measured and compared, and since it was coming from the Worldwide Leader in Sports, it was sure not be left in academic obscurity. And that would be, or would have been, a good thing: passer rating is strange, from its maximum possible score of 158.3 on down, and both over-precise and vague; QBR, on the other hand, was supposed to be easily accessible to the average fan and complex enough to encapsulate both the evaluative concepts that stat-nerds love and the dizzying range of facets that comprise quarterbacking. It was supposed to be a tough thread of reason running through the noise-field emanating from those former players and coaches around those oblong tables. The shouters might even have recognized it, in time, and used it to support or rebut those endless arguments about the Most Clutch Quarterback, or help make clearer just what it is that a QB has when he has that indescribable and undeniable "it." QBR was supposed to be all these things, and so of course it is none of them.

"It’s got a lot of really cool stuff in it," Aaron Schatz of Football Outsiders told me about QBR. "I wish they used it more." Instead, QBR has become a literal sidebar to your regularly scheduled NFL programming—another number vanishing under the crush of all that noise.

***

Until recently, ESPN wanted no part of advanced statistics. Websites like Advanced NFL Stats, Football Outsiders, and their equivalents in every major sport evolved and thrived in the vacuum created by ESPN's proud lack of interest. These online intellectual communities developed in response to the dearth of any such analysis in the mainstream, and created their own statistics to better understand what we saw. But the online stathead scene has always been just a community, never a mass movement. Advanced stats were unlikely to reach the type of person who watches Around The Horn. QBR was, at least in part, an attempt to bridge that gap.

At its core, QBR is an amalgamation of several other stats. Dean Oliver (that's him at left), who's widely regarded as a stats genius and is ESPN’s director of production analytics, consulted the work that Brian Burke and others had done at Advanced NFL Stats and made it the foundation for QBR. The resulting hybrid stat incorporates the concepts of Wins Probability Added and Expected Points Added, both used by Burke. But QBR does several unique things Football Outsiders and Advanced NFL Stats don’t do in their ratings: it combines passing and rushing values, doesn’t adjust for the strength of the opponent, and incorporates ESPN’s game-charting data to assign responsibility to the quarterback depending on each play's outcome. The game-charting is a labor-intensive task that only ESPN could do, Schatz says, and it allows QBR to account for dropped passes, value sacks differently based on the situation, add new wrinkles to air yards, or count scrambles and planned rushes differently, among other things.

Those are, obviously and inevitably, a lot of "other things." But that's quarterbacking, and taking the position's many facets all into account helps make QBR such a useful metric. "The goal of QBR is to come up with the best possible measure of how well a quarterback played," Schatz says, and he emphasized it was pretty good at this. (It's worth mentioning that Schatz, aside from his longstanding role at Football Outsiders, is a regular on ESPN programming. He noted several times to me that he understands how his praise might be perceived, but stressed he truly does value QBR as a good metric.)

As with everything having to do with ESPN, QBR is not without its controversies. Most notably, QBR is proprietary—as are Football Outsiders stats like DYAR and DVOA—meaning that the statistical models behind the stat are still secret. This is an old conflict: the challenge is popularizing a product without losing the ability to commodify it. It's understandable, but it has brought QBR in for some criticism. Schatz defended it—so long as the components of the metric are revealed, which ESPN has done with QBR. "It’s a black box, but I’ll tell you what’s in the box, I just don’t let you see it," Schatz says. "I tell you it’s a ham sandwich. I don’t tell you how many slices of ham it is, or how thick it is, but you know it’s a ham sandwich. It’s the same way with QBR."

Without a doubt, the most controversial aspect of QBR—and the one that would surely please ESPN's bellowing knights of the oblong table—is the Clutch Index, which weights every play according to the situation's import. In football as in baseball, mentioning the word "clutch" is the advanced stats equivalent of yelling "fire" in a crowded theater; people get panicky, incredulous and angry at once, start shouting, and ultimately try and run away as fast as possible. Stuff gets trampled. It's not a good look.

It's also not necessarily a defensible concept. If Quarterback A plays in a blowout, and Quarterback B puts up identical stats as Quarterback A but does so in a close victory that features a fourth quarter comeback, Quarterback B will have the better QBR. (Schatz has written that offensive performance in the first quarter correlates better with winning than performance in any other quarter.) As Schatz clarified, in QBR, "quarterbacks are not rewarded for being in clutch situations, but rather for performing well in them."

But nobody knows how ESPN defines a clutch situation or how it’s weighted, which only adds to the community’s nervousness over the concept. Still, most people outside the comment sections of Football Outsiders do believe in the concept of clutch, and ESPN built QBR for everyone.

Which is a big part of how and why ESPN has not succeeded just yet in crossing-over QBR—the stat is for everyone, which alienates the purists in the stathead community, and yet it took 600 words for me to fully explain the damn thing and so is clearly not for the “average” fan as ESPN conceives that fan to exist. Those who need something simpler than the traditional passer rating because of its infamous 158.3 scale have, in QBR, a metric normalized on a 0-100 scale. But it's not simpler, really, because it couldn't be simpler and even begin to do its job. And it could, arguably, not be simple enough to resonate with brainiacs like Woody Paige while still deserving to be called an idea. The market for QBR is, inevitably, strained.

***

After ESPN's early season QBR-propaganda blitz in 2011, it gradually stopped being talked about on TV. Jaws and Gruden mentioned it less and less on the Monday Night Football broadcast; by my unscientific count, it hasn’t been mentioned once this season. QBR stopped being featured on Monday Night Countdown, and its appearances on SportsCenter tapered off. It is prominent on ESPN.com’s sub-blogs and displayed on Football Outsiders side-by-side with their own stats, but seldom discussed out loud. On Monday Night Football broadcasts, ESPN uses the old passer rating. Nobody is shouting about QBR anymore.

Which makes sense, since this is not a stat built to be shouted about, and because shouting is a lousy way to have a conversation. QBR requires the kind of discourse Burke, Schatz, and their sites have created over years of conversation; it's a metric built on several thousand lines of code, years of investment, and several complex concepts, all of them reduced to one number. It's a great idea, in a discourse broadly resistant to ideas.

Brian Burke isn’t surprised to see ESPN giving QBR the sink-or-swim treatment. "You cannot possibly watch and accurately process all 16 games in one weekend, no less all the games of a season, including the playoffs and Super Bowl," he says. "The purpose of a statistic is to be a first estimate towards the truth, because your brain can’t process all that information. So it’s going to be flawed, but you have to accept that." What ESPN wanted—and what ESPN's way of talking about the NFL demands—from QBR was an argument-ender, a metric that doubled as truth-with-capital-T. But stats don't do that. They can't.

Instead, the complications inherent in advanced statistics only increase the number of things to argue about. "Every time you’re factoring something in, you’re bringing in a possible source of error," Burke says. "Inherent in all statistics is the Central Limit Theorem, which is that a lot of these immeasurables are uncorrelated with what you’re trying to get at. So sometimes it will be the case that a quarterback did make an awesome, exceptionally accurate throw, and sometimes it will be the receiver [who made a big play happen], but on average it’s going to wash out in the long run. That’s why you need the long run."

QBR is maybe best understood as a metaphorical representation of ESPN’s own Central Limit Theorem. In the short run, it seems like a failure because no one is talking about it. But it hasn’t yet been given the long run in which to show its worth. It’s stuck scrolling below the Monday Night Football/Countdown crowd, who are doubtless as skeptical as Gruden about the stat ("I'm concerned about it," Gruden said after it launched. "I’m excited about it. But I’m skeptical.") and almost certainly less excited. If football's designated talkers can’t coherently discuss their feelings about QBR—or if they're so dedicated to the ambiguities of clutch and intangible that they find the very idea of quantification offensive—how can they be expected to discuss QBR itself?

QBR deserved better than this. It’s too useful, too intriguing, and too rich to be dismissed, and not too complicated to be discussed. You don’t have to agree with the clutch index in order to see its potential. You don’t have to embrace its lack of adjusting for defenses to see the value in measuring quarterback performances. But as it stands, QBR is stuck. ESPN programming can’t talk about it coherently, and as Schatz succinctly stated, "This is not meant to be a metric for Brian Burke." So if the ESPN crowd is concerned-excited-skeptical-worried about QBR, but QBR is not sufficiently hardcore for the stat nerds, what is QBR's audience?

There is a chance that QBR is itself the statistical noise that will wash out in the long run per the Central Limit Theorem Burke described; in that case, ESPN programming will continue to be ESPN programming, and the idea of QBR will wither, gather dust, disintegrate back into the internet. Or QBR could be the start of a little renaissance, an idea good enough to last and maybe earn spots for Aaron Schatz, Brian Burke, Dean Oliver and others at those oblong tables. It's still too soon to tell QBR's fate. But this is an easy idea to cheer for, and not just because some quiet reason would bring the volume down in Bristol.

NOTE: For more on the "Clutch Index," and an explanation of QBR from architect Dean Oliver, check out this update.


Share |

Comments

I just found this blog and have high hopes for it to continue. Keep up the great work. its hard to find good ones. I have added to my favorites. Thank You MPT Corporate Events

What a great blog it is!!! You are in truth on your way to colossal success. Well done.
top web design

much obliged this is great online journal. escort in lebanon

I just like the valuable info you provide for your articles.I’ll bookmark your weblog and take a look at once more right here regularly. I am reasonably certain I’ll learn a lot of new stuff proper here http://putlocker0.to

This is my first visit here and I’m fully satisfying to read the whole thing at one place.
Stump Grinding Services Dayton Ohio

Though the site is now dormant, the three statistically inclined baseball fans who wrote the majority of the posts are all now writers for NBC's Parks and Recreation. I took a trip to the offices of that show, where Dave King ("dak"), Alan Yang ("Junior"), and Mike Schur ("Ken Tremendous") filled me in on how FJM became an unexpected hit.beirut escort

The schedule keeps changing, and with the rain, we believe it’s been put off even more. So we don’t want to promise you anything.”cost for private detective

Your content shows the power, I’m about to add this to my bookmarks.
lingerie party

This is very interesting content! I have thoroughly enjoyed reading your points and have come to the conclusion that you are right about many of them. You are great free 0800 numbers

I am consistently stunned by the measure of data accessible on this subject. What you displayed was all around looked into and eloquent with a specific end goal to get your stand on this crosswise over to every one of your perusers. visit this URL

You make sense out of the most complex topics. dui lawyers

Nice blog and absolutely outstanding. You can do something much better but i still say this perfect.Keep trying for the best. detective

I definitely enjoying every little bit of it. It is a great website and nice share. I want to thank you. Good job! You guys do a great blog, and have some great contents. Keep up the good work overseas detective

Good work on this post! I really like the way you delivered your qualitative facts and how you made this fascinating and effortless to realize sg investigating

I experience serious difficulties my contemplations on substance, yet I truly felt I ought to here. Your article is truly awesome. I like the way you composed this dat drug rehab

Really great post, Thank you for sharing This knowledge.Excellently written article, if only all bloggers offered the same level of content as you, the internet would be a much better place. Please keep it up! high trust flow

We offer multiple payback options which include daily, weekly & monthly. Our site offer s "apply now" page as well.Promo codes

i appreciate your efforts taken for the same. I found this essay writing
worth sharing and must share this with all..Pls visit us:

We believe that every fine rug tells a story and manifests a tradition; it is an investment for generations to come and selecting one should be a tailored fulfilling experience.abs exercises

I really like the dear information you offer in your articles. I’m able to bookmark your site and show the kids check out up here generally.jobs near me

I got a great deal of learning subsequent to perusing good fortunes. Topic of web journal is incredible there is very nearly everything to peruse, Brilliant post.Loft conversions twickenham

I read few blog posts on this web site and I believe that your site is real interesting and has lots of great information Miami To Key West

I prefer to read quality content. so happy to find good place to many here in the post. the writing is just great. thanks for the post.roofing london

I definitely really liked every part of it and i also have you saved to fab to look at new information in your site http://www.rickettsandwillshire.com/

threw a bad pass at the worst possible time. That the quarterback happened to be Peyton Manning shouldn’t invert the narrative quite this much. If the quarterback hadn’t been Peyton Manning, it’s hard to believe it would.Temecula

I was pinning away for such type of blogs, thanks for posting this for us.

urlopener

ritten in very a good manner and it entails many useful information for me. I am happy to find your distinguished way of loft conversions teddington

There is urgent need for the good people of this country to emerge from the shadows of indifference, apathy, cynicism, fear, and those other dark places that we migrate to when we are overwhelmed by frustration and the loss of hope. pherx

I am trying to complete my Technology related thesis and collecting information from relevant sources. Writing research thesis is not an easy task as it requires excellent writing skills. I found useful content and good knowledgeable information in your post. So I want to thank you and more info

Here is the "Official" wallpaper from me. I am sure many of the impatient folks out there already created their own versions.
more info

I appreciate your efforts in preparing this post. I really like your blog articles. how to learn Spanish

stays with you while you are alive and dead smelling until you are laid to rest and even represent you in your absence.loft conversions london

We heroically carry forward the flame of humanity, aglow from our torch app on our iPhone.loft conversions london

Writing research thesis is not an easy task as it requires excellent writing skills. I found useful content and good knowledgeable information in your post. So I want to thank you and
more info

I really enjoyed the article. It proved to be Very helpful to me and I am sure to all the commenters here! It’s always nice when you can not only be informed, but also entertained credit score gov

That’s a nice site you people are carrying out there.Samsung fridge services

I am trying to complete my Technology related thesis and collecting information from relevant sources. Writing research thesis is not an easy task as it requires excellent writing skills. I found useful content and good knowledgeable information in your post.
most powerful binocular

that he understands how his praise might be perceived, but stressed he truly does value QBR as a good metric.)Ashy Bines Exposed

I wanted to thank you for this great read!! I definitely enjoying every little bit of it I have you bookmarked to check out new stuff you post. mod clash of clans

this blog and I’m impressed! Extremely useful info specially the last part I care for such information a lot. I was seeking this certain info for a long time. storage locker man dog

Thanks for Nice and Informative Post. This article is really contains lot more information about This Topic Citation Flow

white flour, high-fructose corn syrup, no GMOs, trans fats and additives to not only promote better health but also sustainable farming. buy menstrual cup

contains lot of information. I always prefer to read the quality content and this thing I found in you post.Sameday dry cleaning london

providing and you give it away for free. I love seeing blog that understand the value of providing a quality resource for free.
Pumbing services london

We should always be careful of anyone who has dual national loyalty, since loyalty to any country other than our own usually means that the interests of our own country come second, if at all free diamonds boom beach

Ajax, Pickering, Aurora, Barrie, Georgina and Oshawa approximately within 75 kilometres from our main office. Executive Chairman Pikia Ka Ora Ltd

mluví se o nich právě jen jako o pokleslých, od pravdy vzdálených kopiích kopií, stínech stínů, jež umožňují nejsoucímu svádět k sobě pozornost, jež má cele náležet jen vpravdě jsoucímu, odvracet lidi od pravého poznání a svádět je k sebeuspokojení, jež plyne z falešného mínění.Loft conversions ealing

DelCam, EdgeCam, Inventor, ME30, Mechanical Desktop, Microstation, Pro/E, Solid Edge, SolidWorks, Surfcam, Tebis, Unigraphics a mnoho dalších. saline breast implants

as of late discovered numerous helpful data in your site particularly this online journal page. Among the loads of remarks on your articles. A debt of gratitude is in order for sharing
more info