The Peyton Manning Story

Lies, damn lies, statistics and other things
Share |

At some point in the next week or two, and for an unprecedented fifth time, Peyton Manning will likely win the NFL’s Most Valuable Player award. For more than a few, it’s tough to argue that he hasn’t earned it: after missing a year with a scary-sounding neck injury, Manning led his new team, the Denver Broncos, to a 13-3 season and the top seed in the AFC while essentially tying career highs in completion percentage (His 68.6 mark just trailed his previous best of 68.8), yards (4,659/4,700) and YPG (291.2/293.8). On Saturday, for a (coincidentally?) fourth time, Manning threw two or more interceptions in a playoff loss. It was (less coincidentally) the eighth time in his (record) 12 postseasons that Manning failed to win his first playoff game.

This matters, if that’s the right word for it, but in at least one meaningful way it almost certainly won’t. Manning, like Brett Favre if not quite like Brett Favre, is known not just for his greatness but for the degree to which and the volume at which that greatness is celebrated. He has lost 11 postseason games, which is as many as any quarterback in history, while throwing game-turning interceptions in several playoff games: against the Patriots in an AFC championship, the Saints in Super Bowl XLIV and now the Ravens in this year’s divisional playoffs. It has not really impacted the perception of his genius at all.

In some ways, this is a good thing: a rare instance of sports media holding two contradictory opinions -- Manning as consummate field general; Manning as player who, for whatever reason, has not excelled in big games -- at once without heads exploding. But it’s worth wondering, in the wake of Manning’s most recent defeat, why he’s above the law in this regard, and mostly beyond criticism.

Grantland’s Bill Barnwell, unequivocally the best football writer (on non-Andy Reid related topics) working, led the charge yesterday, explicitly blaming second-year Denver safety Rahim Moore for his mistake -- something Moore did himself in as upfront a way as can be imagined, while the verge of tears -- before acknowledging in passing that Manning’s interception played a role to the loss. 

“You can rightly blame Manning for that second interception, of course,” Barnwell writes. “But the game should never have even gotten to that point. Manning had performed well enough to put his team in an extremely advantageous position. His team promptly blew it. It seems worth separating the two.”

There’s a certain “post hoc, ergo propter hoc” thing at work here, though. Manning’s team explicitly and directly lost the game because they gave up the ball within their opponent’s field goal range, which happened explicitly because of a pass thrown by Manning which was -- by his own admittance -- a bad throw off a bad read. Barnwell essentially absolves Manning of the same thing for which he blames Moore. Whether or not Manning’s defense put him in a position to make a bad play -- and they did -- is irrelevant with regard to the actual very bad play that Manning made. Denver lost the game when their quarterback threw a bad pass at the worst possible time. That the quarterback happened to be Peyton Manning shouldn’t invert the narrative quite this much. If the quarterback hadn’t been Peyton Manning, it’s hard to believe it would.

***

Baseball’s statistics, advanced and un-, are uniquely valued in the sport, and unique in some other ways beside. They’re numbers and decimals on their own but, if taken together, they give us an understanding that’s surprisingly concrete, if not especially poetic. The clear distinction between “power” and “skill/speed” stats help provide a firm idea of the shape, size and style of the individual players that the numbers are supposed to represent; while they’re not there yet, it’s easy to imagine fielding stats like Ultimate Zone Rating eventually rounding out this understanding. The function that baseball statistics play as signals of value (current and predictive) in the noise of the sport -- even when the relative utility or relevance of the stats is being debated, or when curmudgeons fall back on “more like DORK, you blogger nerds” grumpiness -- suggest that we’re all more or less okay with statistics and in agreement on their import. It’s not like that in football.

Mostly, this is because football’s stats are not nearly as illuminating or intuitive as baseball’s. The counting stats are counting stats; the advanced stats are still opaque; quarterback ranking is impenetrable. More to the point, football statistics don’t tell you much about what a player looks like or plays like and -- because of the team-to-team and situational variations in terms of how different positions are used -- they really can’t offer anything other than a suggestion of how effective players are at the style of play that their team uses. Individual stats in football provide only marginally more insight than trying to determine the quality of a violin player using an individual piece of sheet music in an orchestra: you may get an idea, but that idea isn’t worth much without an understanding of role and context and conducting and a host of other obvious influences. Without that other understanding of the broader picture, it’s easy to misconstrue -- or completely misunderstand -- quality; it’s almost impossible to properly construe it. Football stats have some meaning, in other words, but they don’t mean much on their own.

So, what to make of Peyton Manning’s numbers, then? There’s his otherworldly consistency: the twelve 4000-yard seasons, 25-plus TDs in all fourteen of his NFL campaigns, the record twelve trips to the playoffs. These certainly suggest that Manning is the great player of his generation, and he has been rewarded with accolade after accolade -- at least four MVP’s so far, five first-team All-Pro selections, and hilariously high rankings on the type of lists that measure historical greatness to name a few -- that further shore up that impression. He has won passing titles and awards and honors and a great many football games, and so Manning is perceived as a winner.

And he is one, if not necessarily in the most important games of his career. In addition to those eight one-and-done postseasons and four multiple-interception postseason losses, Manning is just 9-11 in the playoffs. He has had supporting casts of varying quality during those seasons, but Manning’s sole successful Super Bowl run included some of his worst-ever playoff performances. His Super Bowl XLI postseason began with two legitimately putrid games -- a three-interception, one-touchdown stinker in a 23-8 victory over the Chiefs, followed by a 15-6 escape against the Ravens in the midst of a no-touchdown, two-pick shitstorm. He turned things around in the second half of an AFC Championship Game win against the Patriots, but neither his Championship Game nor Super Bowl stat-lines were especially inspiring.

Compare this, and even Manning’s regular season resume, to the work of Tom Brady. Brady, who is two years younger than Manning, has spent the second half of his career speaking the preferred language of the pundits in his cosmic argument against Manning. He has passed for more scores in a season; his 50 touchdowns in 2007 surpassed Manning’s old record by one. He has thrown for more yards in a season, 5235 to 4700. He has won three Super Bowls, yet still suffers a certain perception deficit relative to Manning. Brady has been on two fewer All-Pro teams and being chosen for three fewer Pro Bowls, already won 2 less MVP awards and is seen, in a way Manning never has been, as being a product of a coaching system and team culture. On the NFL Network’s list of the greatest players of all-time that I linked above, Brady is ranked 21st; Manning is eighth. He is also in many fewer television commercials, although that’s neither here nor there.

None of which is Manning’s fault, of course. But why are Brady’s achievements couched in the context of Bill Belichick’s genius and the Patriots’ “culture,” while Manning’s successes are seen as standing apart from the work done by coach Tony Dungy -- a significantly more successful coach before he joined forces with Manning than Belichick was when he brought Brady on board -- and Colts GM Bill Polian, who built four Super Bowl teams in Buffalo and won six NFL Executive of the Year Awards? Even by the standards of the NFL’s usual resistance to common sense, this is strange.

***

Narrative, in the free-range “____ is a warrior” and “___ doesn’t have the heart of a champion” sense, is still the language of the NFL broadcast booth. But, in other venues and for some very good reasons, it has eroded under a wave of numbers. Even those who prefer that old emo-soothsaying stuff -- the most hardcore of fans and the hackiest of writers who have begun to cling on for dear life -- use numbers to make their cases. Football stats are inert in a way that baseball stats aren’t, but both can be used selectively to shore up an argument, pro or con. I did it above, as you probably noticed.

There’s not quite a stats-versus-emotion dynamic at work here so much as it’s a debate between different types of stats. Miguel Cabrera’s counting stats win him a Triple Crown and a Most Valuable Player Award; Mike Trout’s superior WAR (and steal totals, and UZR) loses out. ESPN’s tumid choir of Tebow-worshippers focus on his won-loss record as a starter, and leave out the other metrics attesting to his manifest not-goodness. And Peyton Manning cruises towards another MVP because of some numbers, while Adrian Peterson -- another comeback story, another player who made a massive individual impact on a team, and a player who had one of the best seasons for a running back in history -- may see his own numbers fall short. Peyton Manning has numbers that make his case; even Tebow has some numbers that make his. But Manning’s great advantage is one that the NFL’s narrative junkies have constructed over years. His numbers are fine, except when they’re not. But his story is a winner.

This is unfair in a basic sense, but the schism isn’t as daunting as it seems. Stat geeks should be able to acknowledge the relative worth of an evaluation not driven entirely by stats, or by the right stats. Narrative proponents should acknowledge that Manning’s greatness, while buttressed by very-good-to-great regular season stats, owes much to the fact that he’s likable, and that they’re choosing to overlook his postseason performance because of that. And this is all fine: Peyton Manning may sell us shitty pizza and make some bad passes at even-worse moments in the postseason, but he represents what a quarterback is supposed to represent. He stays late after brutal losses to congratulate fellow greats on a career well done. He really does make his teammates better. And he throws for a lot of touchdowns and wins a lot of games, although those are secondary to his harder-to-define greatness.

If that’s why we talk about him the way we do, there are worse stories we could tell. If only to acknowledge that we’re trying to tell a story as much as we’re talking football.


Share |

Comments

I actually spend my little time to read the websites but this blog is quite different from others, this has helped me a lot in my work. Thanks High Domain Authority Backlinks

You fully match our expectation and the selection of our data. cheap car insurance for minors

especially its discussion. From the tons of comments on your articles, I guess I am not the only one having all the leisure here! Keep up the excellent work
debt counselling - (Target South Africa)

threw a bad pass at the worst possible time. That the quarterback happened to be Peyton Manning shouldn’t invert the narrative quite this much. If the quarterback hadn’t been Peyton Manning, it’s hard to believe it would.
debt review - (Target South Africa)

Really amazing blog!!! I enjoyed the complete article? enormous written.million dollar business secrets reviews

Wonderful, just what a blog it is! This blog has provided the helpful data to us continue the good work.
get a loan now

Your blog has everything that is included really a completely useful facts. This post is very good quality. Thank you for presenting a very good post.
Conversion fly

This is such a great honor for me that I am learning from this awesome blog, THANKS
Conversion fly

curtain when we want. (If my editor looks on his Blackberry today, he'll see my dot blinking in snowy Montclair. Why suffer two monster commutes to New York just to write? At least that's my excuse.)menstrual cup reviews 2016

Tremendous thumbs up for making such magnificent web diary page ! A to a great degree extraordinary web journal passage. get more followers | gain likes

You have go to the best site around if you are scanning for in light of the way that all that you need to know, you will find here, at this site, in our articles. Entradas olimpiadas 2016

Your blog is extremely brilliant especially the quality content is really appreciable.http://www.personalcashadvance.com

whatever reason, has not excelled in big games -- at once without heads exploding. But it’s worth wondering, in the wake of Manning’s most recent defeat, why he’s above the law in this regard, and mostly beyond criticism.salle de réception lyon

Robes de Mariée Philippe Apat 2016 2017 robe de soirée achat vetements creoles maillot de bain femme lingerie nuisette 2018.
les nuisettes

This article gives the light in which we can watch the truth. This is exceptionally decent one and gives indepth data. A debt of gratitude is in order for this decent article. virtual ceo lifestyle bonus

Mr. Alireza Hesami who is a licensed Paralegal. He is currently studying law at the University of London International program to have a better understanding of his current legal expertiecostumes.org

Pleasant learning picking up article. This post is truly the best on this significant theme. Lovetraction Lines

I will prefer this blog because it has much more informative stuff.Inbox blueprint 2.0 review

Essentially foreseen that would demonstrate to you that you have people like me who welcome your work. Obviously an incredible post. Complete off to you ! party dresses

Pretty! It was really a wonderful blog. Thanks for the provided information.Inbox Blueprint 2.0 Bonus

-Wheel Drive technology (AWD), as well as a newly developed X-mode control system that is designed for drivers to easily navigate on tough roads, handle slippery surfaces or steep hills with just one switch.top plastic surgery in tampa

That is not by any stretch of the inventive capacity a truly immense clarification, however its all that I could think of in the wake of looking at this. online boutiques

Hey buddies, such a marvelous blog you have made I’m surprised to read such informative stufVirtual CEO lifestyle bonuses

Your article has provoked a considerable measure of positive hobby. I can see why since you have made such a decent showing of making it fascinating. Fat Diminisher System Review

I will be intrigued by more comparative points. i see you got truly extremely valuable themes.. how do you get more followers on instagram
| likes for instagram app

This is an extraordinary motivating article.I am practically satisfied with your great work.You put truly extremely accommodating data. Keep it up. Continue blogging. Hoping to perusing your next post. fake handbags

I am wondering how to make money online on betting because I love betting on cockfighting but i saw there are some streaming website where to bet.activated charcoal powder australia

I have been looking at a couple of your stories and i can state really well done. I will bookmark your online journal video traffic genie pro

I respect this article for the very much investigated substance and magnificent wording. I got so included in this material that I couldn't quit perusing. I am awed with your work and aptitude. Much obliged to you to such an extent. fake handbags

Decent information picking up article. This post is truly the best on this significant theme. Free Wordpress Themes

Pleasant learning picking up article. This post is truly the best on this significant theme. bnb formula review

determine the quality of a violin player using an individual piece of sheet music in an orchestra: you may get an idea, but that idea isn’t worth much without an understanding of role and context and conducting and a host of other obvious influences. Without that other understanding of the broader picture, it’s easy to misconstrue timberfarm

I have checked this link this is really important for the people to get benefit from.direct payday lenders

An unbelievable blog. This blog will indisputably be definitely recommended to my friends as well. . jaipur to delhi one way taxi

Marken (die allerdings nicht neu ist), dass diese Ihre soziale Verantwortung mehr und mehr wahrnehmen, denn schließlich sind diese auch sehr oft auch für bestimmte "Situationen" verantwortlich z.B.kristen archives

I love this post because we can get some useful information from your blog. I expect more post from you guys.prevent damage from tree roots

This substance is composed extremely well. Your utilization of organizing when mentioning your focuses makes your objective facts clear and straightforward. Much obliged to you. website link

confusion avec la plante sureau Hièble (yèble), une recherche sur internet est recommandée mais il y a peu de risques de se tromper.no verification payday loans

What you presented was well researched and well worded in order to get your stand on this across to all your readers.. how to start Importation Business in Nigeria

GM Bill Polian, who built four Super Bowl teams in Buffalo and won six NFL Executive of the Year Awards? Even by the standards of the NFL’s usual resistance to common sense, this is strange.
web builder

It is incredible to have the opportunity to research a prevalent than ordinary quality article with obliging information on focuses that abundance are intrigued on. fishing reel

I encourage you to read this text it is fun described ... Obsession Phrases Review

their quarterback threw a bad pass at the worst possible time. That the quarterback happened to be Peyton Manning shouldn’t invert the narrative quite this much. If the quarterback hadn’t been Peyton Manning, it’s hard to believe it would.
Grout

Cheers for showing to us your blog.I genuinely like the dear information you offer in your articles. https://twitter.com/luckystrike_sf/status/716832715832688640

s visible in this BLOG and sharing the great technology in this BLOG. I had really satisfied by the nice services in this blog and usinEndon

I thought I would leave my first remark. I don"t recognize what to say with the exception of that I have delighted in perusing. Decent blog. I will continue going by this site frequently.
Stanford Pelage

several playoff games: against the Patriots in an AFC championship, the Saints in Super Bowl XLIV and now the Ravens in this year’s divisional playoffs. It has not really impacted the perception of his genius at all.
soulager sciatique

Robes de Mariée Philippe Apat 2016 2017 robe de soirée achat vetements creoles maillot de bain femme lingerie nuisette 2018.
maillot de bain femme

Most regularly it genuinely is engaging to make sense of how to examine content material from various creators and practice a specific thing there. instagram followers | free instagram likes

It’s so nice to have all this sharing, so useful and inspiring. I really appreciate the time and your effor.
VR View