Consider the Eckstein

David Eckstein is retired, and wasn't a star when he was playing. So why does he still stand for so much?
Share |

There was a time, really just a handful of years ago, when sabermetricians and crusting, old-guard journalist-types unsheathed their lightsabers and dueled for the soul of baseball. It was weapons of mass narrative against weapons of mass statistics. Scrappy-gritty-heart-grit-scrap scrappily going to war on WAR. There was a new way to consume baseball, which wanted only to exist without the old way of consuming baseball, which in turn wanted nothing to do with the new. Basement-trapped dweebs, so it was said, were dedicated to turning a beautiful and unpredictable game into advanced calculus. Both narratives are not quite right; but the fact that both exist, and are still clung to as they are, suggests that this is not nearly over.

But it has been fun, mostly, getting to this inconclusive point. There was a website -- bless their hearts -- dedicated to not-so-nuanced satirizing of the proudly ill-informed. But the other side wouldn’t bow out, and still hasn’t; they believe they are defending something important, and the fact that no one is really attacking that thing doesn’t mean they won’t fight to the last grumpy man. There has been a lot of yelling, and there will be more.

Things quieted down for a while, the saturation of numbers and logic and sanity taking significant hold of things. And then Mitch Albom incited a riot by railing against Mike Trout’s MVP candidacy and pumping up Miguel Cabrera’s and generally throwing cliched feces at “made-for-Microsoft categories.”  So there we were, again, lines drawn in the sand. Rob Parker took a side. So did Nate Silver. (These are maybe not the least-biased names to choose, but this hasn’t been a conflict defined by fair play, really.)

Even if both sides have over-indulged in the divide, it’s not impossible to understand. People felt legitimately threatened and mother-beared their cubs and what should have been a mildly contentious and definitely abstracted discussion of the term “value” instead turned into a long, loud conflict of escalating character assassination. The caps lock button was jammed everywhere; people turned into their worst and least generous selves. You know about all this.

What’s so frustrating, and even saddening, about it all is that this whole dumb thing springs so clearly from an inability (on both sides, if on one more notably than the other) to realize that none of this necessarily needs to be mutually exclusive. Instead, both sides dug in as dumbly as possible. You couldn’t feel and know baseball; it was impossible to both comprehend the magnitude of late-game pressure and see value in David Ortiz’s OPS+. Overpriced hot dogs and the smell of the infield grass and the seventh-inning stretch not only didn’t jibe with Baseball-Reference, but were in opposition, a flagrant and cruel piss on poor old Walter Johnson’s grave or something. It couldn’t be a therapeutic getaway for some or a statistically fascinating gold mine for others or just a thing to watch sometimes. It had to be war. There was only one way to see David Eckstein.

***

The whole time, we were always talking about David Eckstein. The Idea of David Eckstein, in a sense, but in a more literal sense the tiny and not-Jewish Caucasian shortstop who gritted his way from Anaheim to St. Louis to Arizona to San Diego to World Series MVP to a career OPS+ of 87 and 20.8 WAR in ten seasons.

In this whole ridiculous argument, Eckstein’s primacy might be most ridiculous. He was never anything other than himself, which was: extremely good at baseball relative to the at-large population, much better than most players at his position for less than a third of his big league career, and inarguably someone who made a shade under $20 million as a Major League baseball player. Eckstein’s story, baseball-wise, isn’t much different from that of many others.

In some ways it was better: Eckstein made an All-Star team and won two World Series. In some ways it was worse. Mostly, though, it was about aesthetics. Eckstein  choked up on the bat and didn’t hit for power and didn’t throw the ball very hard and generally looked kind of out of place and so articulated the unkillable notion that athletic careers can be carved out of will. You know this, too: a spot in the Yankees’ batting order is only a few extra swings in the cage, a few more tape sessions and a handful of fungo bat groundballs away. One hearty kick will knock down Major League Baseball’s locked door. Just make sure you mean it. Or something.

Bits of truth certainly do exist here: there are players whose extra effort pushes them over the edge, and players who lazy their way out of the game. If talent opens doors, some elbow grease surely helps them open more smoothly. But twisting David Eckstein’s career into some referendum on virtue and hard work undermines a simpler and less satisfying truth: he was talented. Workaday and average and sometimes extraordinary, but grounded in ability.

***

Eckstein didn’t get to the Majors by being short; baseball teams don’t narrative their way to World Series. Managers at various levels of baseball understood him in baseball terms and utilized him on the baseball field in those terms. Eckstein the player was and always has been, first and only, a tool wielded for baseball victories. In high school, he was a two-time All-State selection. At Florida, he was All-SEC twice and All-American once. He was drafted in the 19th round of the 1997 draft and waived three years later and still played 10 MLB seasons. This is not nothing, not at all.

But what’s interesting about Eckstein in particular isn’t just that he’s an oft-manipulated metaphor or focal point for baseball turbulence. David Eckstein, as a symbol, is far more weighty and talked about than his career would suggest. Do you know his career numbers, even roughly, offhand? He is his adjectives more than any other particular thing.

When people say they hate David Eckstein, they don’t really mean David Eckstein, the player that Baseball Reference’s similarity scores compares to Rick Burleson and Scott Fletcher. Hating Eckstein is hating a preachy narrowness that relies on words impervious to calculable measure. It’s hating the whole strident gospel that springs from that overdetermined faith. Intangibles. Heart. Grit. Will. Scrap. Toughness. Desire. Words that -- in a game that employs both A-Rod-like godsculptures and Prince Fielder-like, well, non-sculptures -- lay waste to critical thinking of any kind. A reasonable enough thing to hate, but nothing that Eckstein himself ever really asked for.

But he was, for whatever reason and for all his limitations as a player, a pretty great lightning rod. More than anything he ever did on the field, Eckstein-inspired venom accidentally chaperoned the analytics culture towards the mainstream. Bill James was pumping out his Baseball Abstract well before he became Bill James. Even in Michael Lewis’ Moneyball, there are chapters devoted to the movement before the movement. Things were chugging along fairly quietly for a while; Sabermetrics was only sucking in the diehards and natural stat-poring obsessives. The internet had not yet come into its own, which seems especially crucial, here.

What David Eckstein did -- not that he, in particular, did much of anything other than exist as an undersized baseball player wrapped in various sportswriting bearhugs -- was to encourage a sort of hate-learning among those who rejected his columnist-powered applause. Though Sabermetrics, at its heart, was about understanding baseball in precise and seminal ways, it naturally fueled counter-arguments. You could read something, think it was stupid, and then prove it was stupid. Heart was no longer sufficient to bridge the collective knowledge gap; it couldn’t be quantified, as the columnists yowled, but so much else could be. Parsing out what David Eckstein actually was worth, under all the grit-bluster, was in many ways Sabermetrics’ great gateway drug.

***

And only a short time after the first virtual punches bruised egos, sabermetrics earned a majority. It was no longer jailed by the weak-kneed paranoia that the game was losing its charm; it was simply a new and equally beautiful intellectual brushstroke. It was out there on the field, too. GMs were getting smarter, or at least the good ones were, and spending more wisely, evaluating more precisely. The teams that didn’t do this would fall behind. It is working itself out.

Not that the war’s entirely over, of course, or that David Eckstein isn’t still the undersized field of battle. Home runs still matter. So do RBI. Batting average still leads off the box score. Pitchers’ wins are still tabulated, and so are losses. All of these numbers still carry a suggestive and even subversive value that’s so fundamentally couched in the game as history that it’s hard to see them ever fully disappearing.

A .300 batting average will always matter, and so will a Triple Crown and various numbers attached to the names of Hank Aaron and Roger Maris and Barry Bonds and others. These are more than just numbers. They’re markers to cull meaning from thousands of players and endless numbers. It’s easy to get lost in a 162-game season, and it’s part of what turns many people off from baseball. Numbers, or at least their pursuit, help give meaning and purpose to the giant abyss of a single-sport summer humming along.

Yet that’s exactly what has made this entire thing, by and large, a giant pissing contest. Part of what’s so disturbing about the analytics-facing trend, if you’re inclined to be disturbed by it, is that it’s tearing down these statues. Or maybe not quite tearing them down, but adding detail to them, making them look different than what we’d gotten used to. It isn’t so much the idea that OBP is the new batting average; it’s the fear that trending this way will eventually phase the meaning out of Babe Ruth’s 714 home runs. A century’s worth of knowledge, and for many a lifetime’s worth, is trashed simply by being recalculated. There are feelings at stake. The whole thing is sentiment.

The conflict, maybe, is owed to the fact that both sides of the argument can now hear each other so clearly. There is blowback on blowback now that sportswriters and fans are significantly more available to each other, whether by email or in comments sections or, more recently, on Twitter. There are so many places and ways to yell or praise, and the perverting effects of being able to do so anonymously, and so in full embrace of the most ridiculous asshattery.

In the middle of this, getting chewed up in the no-man’s land between the two trenches, is Eckstein. He’s emblematic of how sports sometimes stretch too far into metaphor, when they should probably operate on more practical terms. A World Series MVP didn’t cure his family’s kidney problems. And he’s the forum, the inspiration even, for much of analytics’ charge into something predominant.

But he’s also this: a baseball player that doesn’t look like other baseball players. He’s interesting and admirable because he didn’t play like other baseball players. One side tried to repackage him with hackneyed descriptors; the other bludgeoned his uniqueness by reducing him to his mostly unremarkable statistics. (Mostly but not entirely: he was, per B-R’s WAR, the ninth-most valuable player in the AL in 2002.) What was lost, on both sides, was David Eckstein: the fun of watching him play, the fun of trying to figure his success out. And he was fun, even if he wasn’t spectacular, because of how improbable he was and how it felt to puzzle over all that. It can be hard to remember that.


Share |

Comments

Oakville Wedding Limousines I desire to own that this is the plurality of finest ease of which I've truly examined. Undoubtedly, it really is. The assembly are solely totally astonished by this inform. I love to watch deep again info enters love this.

I am really impressed by reading this article. Interesting post and I really like your take on the issue. I now have a clear idea on what this matter is all about. lowes 10 off coupon

It is evident from this article that the author who published this article has a pretty good brain. I think that this author needs a bit more applause than he usually gets. I seriously believe in you, sir! Social media news

Many people are extremely keen on reading through books will have the ability to distinguish the very best book like a guide along with a book that's bad. Everything is dependent together with your reading through experience NJ Wedding Limo

This is my first time i visit here. I found so many entertaining stuff in your blog, especially its discussion. From the tons of comments on your articles, I guess I am not the only one having all the leisure here! Keep up the good work. I have been meaning to write something like this on my website and you have given me an idea.i can't afford my diabetes medication

The next time I read a blog, I hope that it doesnt disappoint me as much as this one. I mean, I know it was my choice to read, but I actually thought youd have something interesting to say. All I hear is a bunch of whining about something that you could fix if you werent too busy looking for attention.best way to contact your ex boyfriend

Desert safari Thanks Fiona – good point. For most of us, orienting our lives towards love is a huge change. However, once it takes hold, the economic problems usually fade into the background. I’ll reflect on that for the next book

Ultrasound tech salary USA I am in the middle of working on a school report on this topic and your post has helped me with the information I needed to complete it. Thanks.

Admire it regarding positioning the comely amuse…I was summary set regarding a manifold regular this…I identified that can peaceful good, employing likelihood, you would perhaps store positioning a immense sum of blogs greeting cards for every won!

Going to graduate school was a positive decision for me. I enjoyed the coursework, the presentations, the fellow students, and the professors. And since my company reimbursed 100% of the tuition, the only cost that I had to pay on my own was for books and supplies. Otherwise, I received a free master’s degree. All that I had to invest was my time. βερμαχτ μποτες

I would like to thank you for the efforts you have made in writing this article. I am hoping the same best work from you in the future as well. In fact your creative writing abilities has inspired me to start my own BlogEngine blog now. Really the blogging is spreading its wings rapidly. Your write up is a fine example of it.about us

Took me time to read all the comments, but I really enjoyed the article. It proved to be Very helpful to me and I am sure to all the commenters here! It’s always nice when you can not only be informed, but also entertained!kilim Berber rugs

wow, great, I was wondering how to cure acne naturally. and found your site by google, learned a lot, now i’m a bit clear. I’ve bookmark your site and also add rss. keep us updated.SpyBubble pro

I would like to thank you for the efforts you have made in writing this article. I am hoping the same best work from you in the future as well. In fact your creative writing abilities has inspired me to start my own BlogEngine blog now. Really the blogging is spreading its wings rapidly. Your write up is a fine example of it.best method to get your ex back

You might comment on the order system of the blog. You should chat it's splendid. Your blog audit would swell up your visitors. I was very pleased to find this site.I wanted to thank you for this great read!! I definitely enjoying every little bit of it and I have you bookmarked to check out new stuff you post.northpark residences singapore

free facebook likes This is a great inspiring article.I am pretty much pleased with your good work.You put really very helpful information. Keep it up. Keep blogging. Looking to reading your next post.

This is my first time i visit here. I found so many entertaining stuff in your blog, especially its discussion. From the tons of comments on your articles, I guess I am not the only one having all the leisure here! Keep up the good work. I have been meaning to write something like this on my website and you have given me an idea.https://www.rebelmouse.com/pregnancymiraclelisaolson

Pretty good post. I just stumbled upon your blog and wanted to say that I have really enjoyed reading your blog posts. Any way I’ll be subscribing to your feed and I hope you post again soon.PMP course in Singapore

Truly, this article is really one of the very best in the history of articles. I am a antique ’Article’ collector and I sometimes read some new articles if I find them interesting. And I found this one pretty fascinating and it should go into my collection. Very good work!darwin smith grow taller 4 idiots program review

Through this post, I know that your good knowledge in playing with all the pieces was very helpful. I notify that this is the first place where I find issues I've been searching for. You have a clever yet attractive way of writing.über das Verfahren

The next time I read a blog, I hope that it doesnt disappoint me as much as this one. I mean, I know it was my choice to read, but I actually thought youd have something interesting to say. All I hear is a bunch of whining about something that you could fix if you werent too busy looking for attention.strong sight vision program dr. benjamin miller ebook reviews